Exactly, I’d argue kids are the most likely to go to lengths to circumvent the rules

Forget tax havens, eventually some countries will probably become content havens and sell server space hosted there. Probably some carribean island

You could probably chop 1000 calories and handwash your bottoms more often

And that’s why our species will die in the muck after we drain this planet of everything it needs to support our lives

You could double everything in this post too and that’s only 60% consumption.

• 20 m² of personal living space + 20 m² for every 2 ppl as bathroom / kitchen
• 4200 kcal/day
• 2800 kWh/year, but this already includes public services (education/healthcare)
• 1 washing machine per 10 ppl
• 2.4 kg clothing / 6 months
• wear tops for 1.5 days and bottoms for 7.5 days without washing
• 1 laptop per 2 people with a yearly power consumption of 62 kWh. (bizzarely they talk about an 800 MHz computer and seem to confuse HDD and RAM). If your gaming computer used 400 W you could use it for 300 hr/year.

That seems a lot more reasonable to me and we still come in under carrying capacity

If you look at the numbers in your own post these laws are used very rarely, and in every state a fraction of petitions applied for are granted.

There needs to be actual evidence greater than “ex girlfriend said so” for a court to grant the request.

Ironically by the numbers Florida seems to be the state most likely to use the law. Granting a total of 2,355 in 2020. California on the other hand has issued only 984. These are the 3rd and 1st most populous states respectively.

Given how many people go through breakups each year and how many people are insanely petty, seems like it’s not just based on a disgruntled ex’s word.

My understanding is there is not a single state with red flag laws that allow all weapons to be seized based on one person’s word. Well other than a doctor giving a professional diagnosis.

For everyone else you have to have some evidence. Either multiple people witnessing threats/harassment video, or text based evidence.

And here I am going to get a MA in Archaeology lol.

It’ll work out hopefully. I have been gainfully employed in the field off of just my BA, but Trump has basically ruined that job

Yep we have evidence in the paleolithic of individuals without teeth living for several years after they lost them. That means their community was chewing their food for them. Which is crazy to think about.

Not to mention there is also evidence of severely disabled people, typically from injuries, surviving full lives. These individuals mobility would have been very limited, but people jus took care of them. Because that’s what you did.