lemmy.nullspace
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Lee Duna@lemmy.nz to News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days ago

Trump's drops IVF promise, preferring to blame women for infertility

www.salon.com

external-link
message-square
69
link
fedilink
497
external-link

Trump's drops IVF promise, preferring to blame women for infertility

www.salon.com

Lee Duna@lemmy.nz to News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days ago
message-square
69
link
fedilink
Instead of treatment, Project 2025 proposes shaming patients for premarital sex
  • npdean@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    MAGA women not being able to have children is a win

    • A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      3 days ago

      While true, its the other women I worry for

      • npdean@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        3 days ago

        This will trigger a lot of people but since Trump has been elected, it is safe to assume that more than 50% women support him, so…

        • A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          Mmmm im pretty sure he only got like 1/3 of women, it was men who carried him

          Edit: closer to half but women still went majority for Harris

          • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 days ago

            Pretty sure he won with white women

            • A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              3 days ago

              • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                3 days ago

                So… The first picture isn’t really relevant since it doesn’t appear to factor in race.

                The second one is nearly meaningless to me as a static photo. What the hell am I even looking at? Clearly this is something meant to be interacted with.

          • Optional@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            3 days ago

            gonna need to see some stats. republiQan women had their chance and it’s gone now.

            • Optional@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              Lol - gonna need to see stats (downvotes a-poppin’)

              Edit: okay not 2/3 more like half (downvotes continue)

              😆

        • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          Why would you post something that’s so easily disproven?

          • npdean@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            Thanks for the info, I didn’t know

        • frongt@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 days ago

          No, that is not a safe assumption.

        • shishka_b0b@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          no.

          • npdean@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            3 days ago

            It is quite a logical assumption, excluding gerrymandering

            • leadore@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              Not logical at all.

              • npdean@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                3 days ago

                Why?

                • leadore@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 days ago

                  If a candidate wins a majority of the population as a whole, it is not logical to assume they won a majority of all demographics in that population.

                  More specifically, in the previous 2 times he ran before the 2024 election, we knew that the majority of women voters voted against him. And that he won one of those elections in spite of not getting a majority of women. So the logical thing to assume would be that he didn’t get the majority of women in 2024 either, in spite of the fact that he won that election. Which is what happened.

                  • npdean@lemmy.today
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    3 days ago

                    Makes sense

        • erin@piefed.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Well, almost half of women that voted supported him! Guess we’ll just have to abandon the whole lot. Problem solved.

News@lemmy.world

news@lemmy.world

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !news@lemmy.world

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 2.46K users / day
  • 7.43K users / week
  • 10.2K users / month
  • 10.3K users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 31.5K subscribers
  • 1.15K Posts
  • 14.4K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • JonsJava@lemmy.world
  • rjc@lemmy.world
  • Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world
  • Tenthrow@lemmy.world
  • gedaliyah@lemmy.world
  • 🌱 🐄🌱 @lemmy.world
  • jeffw@lemmy.world
  • enu@lemmy.world
  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
  • BE: 0.19.12
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org