So what… Unless he becomes a dictator he is president for another 3.5 years.
Approval ratings don’t mean shit anymore.
Hopefully we will have to start cleaning up all his shit in 3.5 years.
Yeah, wake me when he’s in cuffs
Or a coffin. Let’s not limit the options.
His heart could just explode at any time.
For someone of his age and health status, all it takes is one fall. Just one trip on a rock, misjudgement of a stair step, or simply an uncoordinated shuffle of the feet, and that could destroy the rest of his life. Crash, broken bone, permanent incapacitation.
It’s the tipping point that puts so many people into nursing homes. It’s more than just a physical injury - for those with dementia, these types of events have a particularly destablizing effect on their minds. A bright, independent individual becomes a confused, pain-addled shell of their former self, never to return to their previous “normal” again. If that can happen to people who still have some grasp on their minds, just imagine what would become of Trump.
I want him to live long enough to spend time in a prison cell, or watch his family empire crumble around him. His ego deserves no less.
I hope he has to amputate one of his poorly circulated legs first.
“I do have one piece of good news for Donald Trump and that there is one other presidency that has a lower net approval rating at this point than this one,” Enten said. "The bad news is that it was Donald Trump’s other presidency.
Well that says a lot doesn’t it
I mean kinda, the thing is US citizens also hate the DNC and the DNC will kill any third party attempt or any attempt at systematic serious restructuring of the party so… how much does it matter how much everyone hates Trump?
the DNC will kill any third party attempt or any attempt at systematic serious restructuring of the party
Bullshit. All it takes is people showing up and doing the work. (Spoiler: most people aren’t going to do that.)
What evidence is there to draw the conclusion that the DNC will not do this using the full compliment of corporate money that has been firehosed into the party?
Support your conclusions with evidence or don’t make them so offhandedly.
The ability of anyone to run, of any party to organize, and that truth will out.
That’s my evidence. What’s your evidence?
With the pro-corporate, anti-populist Democratic establishment here to stay, the logical conclusion from our analysis is that politicians who want to win working-class voters shouldn’t just take an oppositional stance toward the economic status quo, but also toward their own party — at least to the extent that the party fails to embrace economic populism. We contend that the candidates with the best chance of winning are the ones with an orientation similar to that of Sanders: in the Democratic Party when necessary, but not of it, and fundamentally opposed to the party’s pro-elite elements.
https://jacobin.com/2025/07/democrats-working-class-cwcp-report
https://nypost.com/2016/07/22/leaked-emails-show-how-democrats-screwed-sanders/
https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=2900848006650278597
https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/11/02/clinton-brazile-hacks-2016-215774/
This is thorough evidence that no, people just turning out to try to create a third party is not going to work, the established power structure of the DNC will see it as an existential threat in a way that it will never see the Republican party as one even if after the Republican party staged an arguably successful violent coup attempt.
Do you want me to keep going?
