• rigatti@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    For the love of god, increase it to something reasonable then implement yearly increases based on inflation so that I never have to hear about this again.

    • Death_Equity@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      This or tie it to the average government wage of a member of Congress, they get a raise and the people get a raise.

      • AllYourSmurf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Tie minimum wage to GDP/GNP, inflation, etc.

        Tie congressional salaries to be a fixed multiple of minimum wage.

        If congress wants more money, they have to make everyone’s situation better.

  • Nimo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    You should have gone to school, you could’ve learned a trade But you laid in the bed where the bums have laid Now all the time you’re crying that you’re underpaid It’s like that (what?) and that’s the way it is Huh!

    • Nimo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I love how this comment is getting voted down - truth hurts 😅😂

        • Nimo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s a BIG factor…poor academic attainment is the driving force behind the majority of minimum wage jobs. If you’re smart and have drive you don’t work for $7 p/h.

          • twig@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Say that’s true. Do you then actually believe that if you’re not smart or you “don’t have drive,” you somehow deserve to be unhoused or starve, to be unable to access healthcare?

            I’m all for people improving their lives, but as a baseline I just don’t believe that certain people deserve the consequences of horrible poverty just because they didn’t or couldn’t perform academically.

            Also what’s the justification for having a system that allows employers to exploit workers by paying poverty wages while materially benefiting from that labor?

            • Nimo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              The question fundamentally misunderstands the nature of human existence and the principles of a free society. No one deserves to starve or be unhoused, but reality does not cater to mere desires or needs. The essence of survival and prosperity lies in an individual’s ability to think, produce, and trade value for value.

              Those who are not smart or lack drive must still be responsible for their own lives. A free society offers opportunities for all, but it does not guarantee outcomes regardless of effort or ability. The moral and practical basis of capitalism is that each individual must earn their way through rational thought and productive work.

              It is not the role of employers to ensure the well-being of their workers beyond the agreed-upon exchange of labor for wages. Employers do not exploit workers; they offer them opportunities. Workers are free to accept these terms or seek better ones elsewhere. The notion of “poverty wages” ignores the individual’s responsibility to improve their skills and increase their value in the marketplace.