I guess the age of influencer is now coming to an end. No where can be considered ‘public’ if copyright faces show up in the background.expectation of privacy is back on the menu.
No this says you can’t create an AI version of you in one county not that you have any right to whatever happens in public in any of them which is already a patcgwork of laws but which is generally fairly unregulated.
The fact that even barely audible music in the background is considered a copyright violation on youtube and people have to cut the sound or overwrite it is abuse of the laws IMHO.
I guess the age of influencer is now coming to an end. No where can be considered ‘public’ if copyright faces show up in the background.expectation of privacy is back on the menu.
No this says you can’t create an AI version of you in one county not that you have any right to whatever happens in public in any of them which is already a patcgwork of laws but which is generally fairly unregulated.
I would imagine they differentiate between incidental background usage and deliberate exploitation of your likeness.
The bill is specifically aimed at AI alterations, not general usage.
The fact that even barely audible music in the background is considered a copyright violation on youtube and people have to cut the sound or overwrite it is abuse of the laws IMHO.