• db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    5 days ago

    Fascinating that you would bring SPD specifically, which, as it turns out, just outright murdered libsocs when they got in power.

    • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      Fascinating that you would bring SPD specifically, which, as it turns out, just outright murdered libsocs when they got in power.

      Repeating tankie talking points now, are we? How lovely that you don’t even bother with the mask anymore, just outright simping for an attempted coup along explicitly Bolshevik lines against a government that had announced national elections wherein the KPD (that’s the Communist Party of Germany, mind you, not the Libertarian Socialist Party of Germany) was in no way restricted from running.

      But I guess you just have a general dislike for elections and democracy. I hear you can pick up a nice armband from the National Socialist Party; they seem your speed on the subject of both elections and genocide.

      • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        Well, at least the masks are off now. We know what PJ would do when libsocs are actually a danger to the system: Join the Fash and call for their execution.

        • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          Well, at least the masks are off now. We know what PJ would do when libsocs are actually a danger to the system: Join the Fash and call for their execution.

          Because I… think that attempting to use force to suppress proposed democratic elections was a bad thing, even if the ones using force were painted red?

          That’s what “mask-off” is to you? Literally being anti-tankie?

          Nice job ignoring that the KPD proposed a system explicitly along Bolshevik lines, not ‘libsoc’, the Bolsheviks having already overthrown an elected leftist government in Russia by this time.

            • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              12
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              5 days ago

              You’re the truest example of a scratched liberal.

              Because I take the “democratic” in “democratic socialism” seriously?

              You’re sitting here quite literally simping for an attempt to coup a government instead of participating in democracy, explicitly along the lines of an authoritarian government which had overthrown leftists in Russia.

              Sorry for believing in democracy, I understand that your curious form of ‘anarchism’ apparently thinks that the Vanguard Party knows what’s best for the unwashed masses, and must impose that will by force upon them.

              The People’s Hierarchy!

            • Eldritch@piefed.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 days ago

              Why post disengage. Why not just do it. As an administrator, as a moderator it’s clear you knew what the correct actions were. You just couldn’t take your own advice. And it only gets worse from there.

              I’m not here to take a side in the greater argument. I wasn’t here for it, and don’t have a dog in the fight necessarily. That and I suppose “oh no, drama in a drama sub”. But whatever impression or perception I had of you. At this point you’re tarnishing. Not that that necessarily means anything. I’m no one special. Not that the original accusation wasn’t hyperbole. But you are only lending it credence the more you post now.

              • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                9
                ·
                5 days ago

                Why post disengage. Why not just do it. As an administrator, as a moderator it’s clear you knew what the correct actions were. You just couldn’t take your own advice. And it only gets worse from there.

                Because that signals one doesn’t want to continue the discussion explicitly and that the other person shouldn’t keep waiting for an answer that will never come. It grants the last word to the other party as well. Not quite sure what your issue is with the disengange.

                • Eldritch@piefed.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  10
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  5 days ago

                  Posting is definitialy engagement. It’s explicitly the opposite of letting them have the last word. Especially when you continue to engage afterwards.

                  Maybe I’m an uncouth Ozark hillbilly who’s parents grew up in houses with dirt floors. Maybe it was some masterdebater super move on your part. But my problem with it as you put it. Specifically is that even you didn’t seem to respect it afterwards. 🤷‍♂️

                  Your first post way up top was “adequate”. You’ll never win 100% in the face of drama. Continuing to post, you’re just weakening it.