Alt text: A line plot with 2 axis (confidence vs competence) referencing the Dunning-Kruger effect with various distro logos placed at different points on the line. Starts with mint/ubuntu near (0,0) and progressing through multiple distros to end up with opensuse/fedora at what it calls “the plateau of sustainability”

  • redsand@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 days ago

    Truely don’t understand how this one became popular. But I’m sure it will fade like Crunchbang or a dozen others before it.

    • unrealMinotaur@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      NixOS came out in 2003, crunchbang came out in 2008. As someone who swapped to NixOS after reaching the “plateau of stability” and realizing I needed more power, while the distro is a clusterfuck that shouldn’t be as popular as it is. It has some very clear and defined use cases, so I don’t see it dying any time soon.

    • spikespaz@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      15 days ago

      It’s the most unique distro to date, and has all the strengths the others. Because it’s not a tool for building distros, and NixOS is just the posterboy.

        • spikespaz@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          15 days ago

          Silver blue is just an OSTree implementation. NixOS is deterministic. Think of it as, the distributable for silverblue is an immutable system image. Whereas, the distributable for Nix(OS) is a blueprint for anything, including immutable system images, or something more customized. You’re also exempt from the downsides of OSTree.