• Zorque@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 days ago

    There was also a worldwide effort to fix any potential problems before they happened.

    • SreudianFlip@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      Cobol mavens burned both ends of the candle and made bank, while making banks work.

      Many were old enough to retire after that.

    • MCasq_qsaCJ_234@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      Issue 2038 will be easier to fix because many systems are already 64-bit, as 32-bit systems could only handle 4 GB of RAM, and programs need more RAM.

      The only issue would be critical issues that run on 32-bit systems and must be fixed before that date.

      • setsubyou@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        32-bit systems could only handle 4 GB of RAM

        I don’t understand why people always say that. Pentium Pro could handle 64 GB even though it was a 32 bit CPU. It had a 36 bit address bus. Later models are the same.

        • Flatfire@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 days ago

          People say it because it was a Windows limitation, not a computing limitation. Windows Server had support for more, but for consumers, it wasn’t easily doable. I believe there’s modern workarounds though. The real limit is how much memory a single application can address at any given time.