• BorgDrone@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    You have to exist to be able to write stuff down, so that’s probably why he didn’t.

    • CXORA@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      There probably was a historical jesus.

      Otherwise I don’t see why Christians would have made up the whole trip to Bethlehem story about a census which we have no record of. They needed the real jesus to have some reason to be in the prophecied place.

      • BorgDrone@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        At that time in that region there were a lot of cults. It’s very likely that the Jesus figure from the bible is an amalgamation of multiple cult leaders from that period.

        • CXORA@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          Of course, by the definition of cult used at that time all monotheistic and henotheistic religions are cults.

          • BorgDrone@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            Yes they are. The only difference between a cult and a religion is the number of followers.

            • CXORA@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              Well no, in the first century a cult is a group which worships a single god. Like the various mystery cults that thrived in ancient Rome.