• Mugita Sokio@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Unfortunately, he was classified as one. While he engaged in Socratic debate, he was a Jesuit Zionist through and through. As a partial German-American Khazar myself, I would know that big time.

      Edit: To clarify this, as I’ve since learned the nuance that comes with it. As long as you don’t incite abstract/direct violence, and you say whatever the flip you’d like, that I defend. It’s only if you incite a crime with your speech that I can’t defend it.

      • Concetta@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        You use lots of words that have extremely little meaning in this context. He was a piece of shit fascist who called for genocide of several minority groups, if you’re trying to defend his talking points that makes you a fascist.

        • Mugita Sokio@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          5 days ago

          I never defended him, but I would’ve defended his right to speak, even if I disagreed with him. That’s what being a classical liberal is.

        • Mugita Sokio@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          16
          ·
          5 days ago

          The unfortunate part was he had potential to be a decent human being. He did call for the murder of certain people groups (it’s rhetorical) just because they were of the line of Israel, and not us Khazars (I agree with the fact that us Khazars don’t deserve the holy land).

          • Concetta@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            5 days ago

            And how long ago did this potential stop? Because he’s been spouting fascist talking points for longer than I’ve been an adult, and he was not that much older than me lmao

            • Mugita Sokio@discuss.online
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              3 days ago

              I don’t think you see the difference between defending one’s right to speak, and defending their actions. I never defended his actions, but his right to speak… that I would’ve defended regardless. After all, the conservatives lost power in the 1970’s, which is why I don’t care about politics anymore (Neigsendoig and I used to be heavy Jesuit sympathizing fascists).

              Edit: To clarify this, as I’ve since learned the nuance that comes with it. As long as you don’t incite abstract/direct violence, and you say whatever the flip you’d like, that I defend. It’s only if you incite a crime with your speech that I can’t defend it.