Selected quotes:

Colorado’s law is very clear. Law enforcement does law enforcement. In Colorado, law enforcement doesn’t do federal immigration enforcement. The line is when a sheriff’s deputy, in this case, actually detain somebody in a vehicle for the purpose of enabling federal immigration enforcement to detain that person.

At that point, you’re not operating as a Colorado law enforcement anymore, because there was no Colorado law that was determined to be violated.

It’s very important to note here, this wasn’t about community safety. There was no basis for concern that she had committed any crime, posed any threat to public safety.

When there are people who commit violent crimes, crimes that warrant being deported, Colorado law enforcement routinely will share information, as provided under Colorado law, so that ICE can do their job and deport people who are dangerous. But this was a case of someone who hadn’t done anything wrong, didn’t pose any threat to public safety.

In that case, Colorado law enforcement shouldn’t take it upon an individual to go ahead and start acting as if you’re doing federal immigration enforcement solely for purposes of enforcing immigration law, which is totally federal, not for purposes of keeping communities safe. That’s what a state’s job is.

We in Colorado cooperate all the time with federal law enforcement partners. And if someone is here without authorization and they have done harmful, dangerous actions, they should be held to account. But what Colorado law says is, we need our law enforcement focused on law enforcement. We don’t have enough law enforcement officers in Colorado.

That’s a public policy decision that we’re making not to do the federal government’s work. It’s their job to do that work.

Phil Weiser, Attorney-General of Colorado

  • Zombiepirate@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    The audio from the body cam is there to hear, and it didn’t indicate who was talking in the moment. But that is indeed what he said.

    Agreed that it is disappointing.

    • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 days ago

      The audio in article doesn’t state

      Alexander Zwinck, Mesa County, Arizona, Sheriff’s Office

      Only the “Transcript” does. So no… you can’t say that’s what he said. The transcript itself shows the indication of who’s talking and stating that the officer is from Arizona is in the indicator… not the actual spoken words…

      This is literally PBS feeding their shit through an LLM and not checking the results.

      • Zombiepirate@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        12 days ago

        You’ve misunderstood.

        The audio says who it is (but not in the moment), and the AI transcript got it wrong. Feel free to listen to the audio to confirm.