• Genius@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    15 hours ago

    I agree with the message but making the argument that it’s safe for kids to watch because it’s cartoons is wrong. Kids can be fucked up by 2D furry porn, I’ve seen it happen. Still agree that age verification is a security nightmare, just think it’s a weird argument.

      • chrischryse@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Thhink they are referring to it saying “requiring age verification for fictional cartoon content is an overreach that fails to recognize the distinction between real world and adult material”

      • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Paragraph 3 “Requiring age verification for fictional cartoon content is an overreach thay fails to recognize the distinction between real-world adult material and artistic, animated works.” etc

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      15 hours ago

      I’m on the fence, because do kids need to be seeing glimmer choke down on a futa She-Ra? No. But does the UK Guv need to de-anonymize the internet to stop it? Fuck. No.

      • Genius@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        There’s a third option: taking responsibility as a community to educate kids on the harmful effects of being exposed to sexual content at a young age, and then letting them make that mistake if they really really want to. Put up a warning about how porn can damage the mind. And then give them the same freedoms as adults (when it comes to passive consumption), because restricting their freedoms would restrict everyone’s.