• starman2112@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Don’t think you’re being a little dramatic? There are many more costs involved in owning a house than the mortgage payment.

    Yes, and my rent covers literally all of them. Again, it has to, or else my landlord would be renting this house at a loss. I don’t want the opportunity to pack up and move on short notice. I’ve lived in this city since I was born, and I intend to die here. I should not be forced to pay a premium for a feature I will never use.

    • ObjectivityIncarnate@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Yes, and my rent covers literally all of them.

      So, nothing’s keeping you from buying a house then, since what you already pay in rent covers all of the cost. Right?

      I should not be forced to pay a premium for a feature I will never use.

      Why haven’t you bought a house already, then? Could it be that it doesn’t just cost what you pay in rent each month?

      • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        13 hours ago

        Do you reckon I’d qualify for a mortgage with my <$30,000/year income and my zero credit history? If you do, I might actually look into it

        Could it be that it doesn’t just cost what you pay in rent each month?

        Do u reckon every landlord is renting out their houses for a loss??? You get that that’s what you’re implying, right? Like obviously my landlord is better equipped to handle a big expense all at once, but that’s because the cost is amortized across many many months of my rent payments.