• PattyMcB@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 days ago

    Aww… Vibe coding got you into trouble? Big shocker.

    You get what you fucking deserve.

    • Aatube@kbin.melroy.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 days ago

      he was smart enough to just roll back to a backup

      edit: downvoting me doesn’t change what happened. read the article people or atl ctrl+f for “rollback”

  • zerofk@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    11 days ago

    in which the service admitted to “a catastrophic error of judgement”

    It’s fancy text completion - it does not have judgement.

    The way he talks about it shows he still doesn’t understand that. It doesn’t matter that you tell it simmering in ALL CAPS because that is no different from any other text.

    • hisao@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 days ago

      Are you aware of generalization and it being able to infer things and work with facts in highly abstract way? Might not necessarily be judgement, but definitely more than just completion. If a model is capable of only completion (ie suggesting only the exact text strings present in its training set), it means it suffers from heavy underfitting in AI terms.

        • hisao@ani.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 days ago

          Coming up with even more vague terms to try to downplay it is missing the point. The point is simple: it’s able to solve complex problems and do very impressive things that even human struggle to, in very short time. It doesn’t really matter what we consider true abstract thought of true inference. If that is something humans do, then what it does might very well be more powerful than true abstract thought, because it’s able to solve more complex problems and perform more complex pattern matching.

          • Jhex@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 days ago

            The point is simple: it’s able to solve complex problems and do very impressive things that even human struggle to, in very short time

            You mean like a calculator does?

  • dan@upvote.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    11 days ago

    At this burn rate, I’ll likely be spending $8,000 month,” he added. “And you know what? I’m not even mad about it. I’m locked in.”

    For that price, why not just hire a developer full-time? For nearly $100k/year, you could find a very good intermediate or senior developer even in Europe or the USA (outside of expensive places like Silicon Valley and New York).

    The job market isn’t great for developers at the moment - there’s been lots of layoffs over the past few years and not enough new jobs for all the people who were laid off - so you’d absolutely find someone.

    • Tony Bark@pawb.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      11 days ago

      Corporations: “Employees are too expensive!”

      Also, corporations: “$100k/yr for a bot? Sure.”

      • dan@upvote.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 days ago

        There’s a lot of other expenses with an employee (like payroll taxes, benefits, retirement plans, health plan if they’re in the USA, etc), but you could find a self-employed freelancer for example.

        Or just get an employee anyways because you’ll still likely have a positive ROI. A good developer will take your abstract list of vague requirements and produce something useful and maintainable.

        • floo@retrolemmy.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          11 days ago

          Most of those expenses are mitigated by the fact that companies buy them in bulk on huge plans. As a freelance contractor myself, I pay a lot more for insurance than I did when I worked for a company. And a retirement plan? Benefits? Lol.

          • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            11 days ago

            Most of those expenses are mitigated by the fact that companies buy them in bulk on huge plans.

            There’s no bulk rate on payroll taxes or retirement benefits (pensions or employer 401k match). There can be some discounts on health insurance, but is not very much and those are at orders of magnitude. So company with 500 employees will pay the same rates as 900. You get partial discounts if you have something like 10,000 employees.

            If you’re earning $100k gross as an employee, your employer is spending $125k to $140k for their total costs (your $100k gross pay is included in that number).

            • floo@retrolemmy.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              11 days ago

              Large companies also make massive profits because of the scale they work on. Matching 401(k) contributions? It doesn’t need to be an order of magnitude larger for it to make a huge difference. Simply doubling my 401(k) is a big deal.

              And of course they get a “ball rate“ on payroll taxes, especially for companies who have over 1000 employees or over 5000 over 10,000. They experienced this by having a lower tax rate for larger businesses.

              Not to mention that they often pay more and pay a steady wage due to the fact they can afford it. Freelance contractors make less, and work isn’t guaranteed to be steady.

              Businesses, particularly word businesses, operate on much larger profit margins than most of any freelance contractor.