• dhork@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Nowhere in all these articles does it say where they plan to do this. I remember when they were planning to charge Trump, significant thought was put in to where to charge him, because the charges had to be brought where the crimes were committed, otherwise there may be grounds to dismiss the case. This is why they brought some charges in Florida, which conveniently went to Trump’s pet judge. Other charges were brought in DC, with judges who were less sycophantic sympathetic to Trump.

    It would be on brand to bring these charges in deep-red Trump country, where a grand jury would indict a potato if it were brown, then complain when it got dismissed due to jurisdictional issues that Obama “got away on a technicality”…

  • cmoney@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’m so excited to watch the mental gymnastic Olympics on why presidential immunity doesn’t apply in this case.

  • Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Not the bipartisan, but Republican lead, Senate committee report that found the same thing - that Russia influenced the election in favor of Republicans?

    Remember, it’s P. Tape, not pee tape. As in the Epstein variety.