The local Albertan, rediscovering what it means to be me. May play devil’s advocate at times, as I like being nuanced.

Enjoys electronic music, adorable art, rhythm games, and perogies among other things.

I have lemmy.world and piefed.world blocked. Sorry, too much American politics and an unfortunate amount of casual transphobia for my liking. Feels like talking to a brick wall with people and I can’t be bothered anymore.

Also have lemmy.ml blocked for transphobia and gross dismissal of human rights issues in China by the admins.

  • 4 Posts
  • 20 Comments
Joined 18 days ago
cake
Cake day: August 29th, 2025

help-circle





  • Wish I could find more vegan ice cream. Chapman’s has a sugar-free lactose-free ice cream. Issue is that because it uses maltitol as the artificial sweetener, you basically end up with the same effect as if there was lactose if you have too much of it in one go. For context, maltitol is the same sweetener used in the infamous Haribo sugar-free gummy bears.

    There was a brand I came across long time back that was oat-based and Canadian. Just can’t find them anywhere anymore since the Urban Fare out this way in 'berta was converted to a Save On and no longer carries it.







  • You do realise they present these in the House, right? This isn’t change.org. They bring the issues into parliament, and with that, politicians are able to held more directly accountable because one simply can’t just state that they weren’t aware of the issue. They are put on record as to whether or not they were present when the petition was presented by a sponsoring MP, and are put on record for their stance on it.

    People that say “petitions do nothing” talk about corporate sites like change.org where it is literally inadmissible. OurCommons is literally provided by the federal government to give your voice to parliament.






  • Not to give too much leeway to these companies, but I feel like the reason for this is all a confusion of what consumers are wanting.

    On the part of the consumer, they want more stuff made here in Canada, but on the part of the grocery stores, they either misread the room and think they want Canadian brands, or assume they know better and go by Canadian brands seeing how so much of what we get at the grocery store in Canada either isn’t grown at demand, or can’t be grown here at all.

    This would probably be best sorted with a better product labeling system enforced by the government. I used to work on Open Food Facts a lot (stopped doing so for a variety of reasons), and learned that how we label food here is so confusing when we can make it much more simplified and easier to read.

    Something like a checklist format would be nice. Something like:

    Canadian brand? [checkbox]
    Domestically owned? [checkbox]
    Canadian Ingredients? [five bars shifting from red to green, each bar being the closest 20% increment of domestic ingredients by volume]

    Just this would help a tonne. You can identify truly Canadian brands and keep your dollars in Canada, and also do so more intensely if you wish by avoiding products that fail to meet a certain threshold of domestic ingredients. It prevents companies from having to assume they know better than the consumer when it comes to assuming what they actually want, and replaces the “made with domestic and imported ingredients”, “product of Canada”, and “Made in Canada” labels with something that paints a more clear and obvious picture to the consumer.

    I do think there is some level of malice, but I think this is overwhelmingly just companies throwing their shoulders up in confusion when major products we buy (coffee, chocolate, tea, sugar for most of Canada) just aren’t grown here, and don’t want the less informed types spending all day looking at labels for a chocolate bar with Canadian-grown cocoa when Canadian brands are the closest thing to what they want lol.








  • Chiming in to say it’s not just Trump. It’s the capitulation to Trump from the “opposition” as well, from both politicians, and, unfortunately, a significant portion of voters.

    I’m seeing people defend Gavin Newsom over transphobic comments, and instead of demanding better or seeking someone more in line with their beliefs, they’ll attack people who point that out and say “oh, we need to capitulate on this issue because he’s the ‘best’ chance we have!”.

    And it’s like congrats, you’re capitulating your values to be more in line with the people taking people’s rights away, saying that certain people’s rights are now on the table as some sort of playing card in politics… which is exactly what the far-right wants normalised.

    Then you have people like Mamdani come about where they don’t use people’s rights as a chess piece, and the same people who espouse “unification” will be up in arms about how that doesn’t apply to those they disagree with. Democrats have been playing the capitulation game for so long rather than chart their own path, have made zero gains on that front, and decided that doubling down on that is the way to go despite Republicans making it clear as day they have no interest in changing stance.

    All while they further lose support from the people that vote for them, those who are disenfranchised and watching as both parties veer more to the right at the cost of their rights and well-being, and with those who still support them being as smug and insufferable as the people they claim to be opposed to.