

Yes, I just glossed over that detail by saying “similar to”, but that is a more accurate explanation.
I keep picking instances that don’t last. I’m formerly known as:
@EpeeGnome@lemm.ee
@EpeeGnome@lemmy.fmhy.net
@EpeeGnome@lemmy.antemeridiem.xyz
@EpeeGnome@lemmy.fmhy.ml
Yes, I just glossed over that detail by saying “similar to”, but that is a more accurate explanation.
“They’ve been saying so many bad things about him for decades, and nothing stuck. He says he’s innocent, so who should I believe, the man I trust, or the lying media and the deep state? They just have it out for him because he tells it like he sees it.” You can point out all the inconsistencies in what Trump says, but they’ve tuned out already. They already know what they need to about him, or they just aren’t detail people at all. Some are so far gone, they think, “He’s a good person, therefore whatever it was he did was a good thing.”
Unfortunately the most probable response to a question is an authoritative answer, so that’s what usually comes out of them. They don’t actually know what they do or don’t know. If they happen to describe themselves accurately, it’s only because a similar description was in the training data, or they where specifically instructed to answer that way.
Dumpster concerns aside, I think these count as feral yeast.
Dude went dumpster diving for a name. It’s not theft if they’re throwing it away. One woman’s trash is another man’s treasure.
There is no lie. It’s just tough to admit that it’s fairly accurate.