Spoken as somebody who doesn’t know german politician’s stubbornness to go even the wrong way till it’s end.

I hope you’re right, but I’m not too optimistic, especially with us having a BlackRock manager as chancellor.

I think you can include all G20 states there.

I only got it by the explanation in the fourth panel, but I also live in a country with general healthcare, so maybe that other commentator is right.

Sure, you can see it that way and I wouldn’t even argue it’s illogical. But the way socialism was taught in GDR is the definition I gave above and China is not socialist under that definition.

That’s easy: private ownership of means of production is not socialist.

I will even include another non socialist fact : China has billionaires (in US$). Those should not exist in a socialist country.

Pah, if you want to flex on us, show us some reactions. Stuff that doesn’t react and just decays is boring! (⌐■_■)

‘Lay yourself bare before your therapist!’ Gets a whole new meaning (or not for some of your clients ^^")

I really think there is a market niche that combines your two professions to finally get more men to go to therapy.

Definition of Zionism according to Wikipedia, with sources there:

Zionism[a] is an ethnocultural nationalist[b] movement that emerged in late 19th-century Europe to establish and support a Jewish homeland through the colonization of Palestine,[2] a region corresponding to the Land of Israel in Judaism[3] and central to Jewish history. Zionists wanted to create a Jewish state in Palestine with as much land, as many Jews, and as few Palestinian Arabs as possible.[4]

Ethnocultural nationalist want a pure state with as few others as possible? While genociding those others at the moment and also already during the establishment of said ethnonational state?

Sounds fascist enough for me.

While the person honking probably doesn’t intend it that way, it gives a warning to others who can’t see it yet to be careful, because something unusual is happening.

Then you should know that science advances mostly in small steps instead of big ones? And that additional data helps supporting other ideas, so that other researcher can build on those?

From a quick search, wearable tattoos for drug testing are a pretty recent development. And often it’s not only about the what, but especially in an early field about the how. Other researcher can look into this and get ideas for how to incorporate the fundamentals for other drug testing compounds.

Is this contribution going to save the world or stop all date rape drugging? No.

You completely missed the point.

You complained in a pretty smug way about science not being fast enough.

Problems often don’t have easy solutions or they would have been already found. Finding solutions which fulfill all or at least most requirements takes time. If you don’t like that, start contributing. But just sitting there and complaining that it doesn’t work like a video game where X research happens after Y time is just stupid.

Criticism is fine. But you just wanted to feel smug as e evident by the way of your comment.

I mean, you are free to go into the lab and research your own selectively recognising, non-toxic, stable, easy to use chemical. Shouldn’t take you long since you are such an expert.