

I mean, the fact that there is stuff for sale in the US with the label saying “scientists in California have proven this causes cancer” is proof enough that even a crazy nutter like RFK can be sometimes right.
I mean, the fact that there is stuff for sale in the US with the label saying “scientists in California have proven this causes cancer” is proof enough that even a crazy nutter like RFK can be sometimes right.
He didn’t come in go fix things. You can argue he did the first time he was president (even though most of his decisions then also backfired and were shit) but this time around all he’s doing is destroy things.
Merrick Garland is honestly the worst, in a way everything that’s going on right now is (in)directly caused by him. He could have been quicker getting Trump jailed over the Jan 6 stuff, he could’ve done more with these files… He just did a shit job in general.
Sure, and it probably makes sense in the context he said it in, but I still think it’s worse than denying what they ask him. To me it always feels like that person has something to hide.
It’s the same in the Netherlands. The most vulnerable traffic participant is always protected. Bicycle gets hit by a car? Cars fault. Pedestrian gets hit by a bicycle? Cyclists fault. And so on.