

“Non-violence” only means that the oppressed should not use violence.
Definitely with you on the unions, too.
“Non-violence” only means that the oppressed should not use violence.
Definitely with you on the unions, too.
No, they only argue in bad faith. Debating them or applying any kind of logical consistency to their actions or arguments is falling right into their trap because then they suck up all your energy until you’re too tired to do anything about it anymore.
Oh ok lol, thanks for clearing that up.
You mean the lemmy repost of the reddit repost of the tweet? lol
Yea, but check out this whois:
Did you notice
The website was created the day before he got killed???
It should be no surprise that these people
want to take your power away from you and silence you. Don’t fall for it. They need you to think you’re powerless because we have the power to stop them. Organize! Just like they can organize 80+ busses for an insurrection to topple democracy, we can do the same to protect democracy. We have to!
It’s fucked up, it’s literally a doxxing website for stochastic terrorism. Someone else put it well:
Rolling Stone explains the hypocrisy.
And there’s a long tradition of right wing extremists using the state (as well as non-state actors like the KKK, Three Percenters, etc.) to silence any criticism or even recognition of their heinous actions.
But yea, you’re not supposed to see through it immediately, as you did lmao
Belgium: “Best I can do is continue both-sidesing a genocide”
👎
Narrator: it does not work on Lemmy
!remindme 1 day
So they are going to change their electoral tactics, right?
Right???
Does !remindme work on Lemmy?
Are children throwing rocks counted as militants? And how are military reserves counted, are they considered civilians or militants, since, in the case of Israel, they have a uniform and weapon nearby to be ready to be called into service?
Edit: are reserves counted differently in times of peace vs. when a declaration of war has been made?
Is that a real twitter account? It’s had some bangers lately.
It’s much worse than this, the article explains it pretty well. If BBC management decides to inject political spin on the topic of Palestine, why wouldn’t they do it on another topic as well? That is why they lose credibility in some people’s eyes.