Out of the frying pan and into the fire.

I’m glad I stopped expecting logic from you people.

Just so we’re clear, you think news outlets don’t use the word “migrant” in place of “immigrant” when the subject(s) is question are known to be immigrants or trying to immigrate?

A simple yes or no will suffice.

Tired of arguing with you people.

That doesn’t mean he’s correct or has a point, which he doesn’t.

But hey man, you do you. Let people waste your time.

Always funny how the people in power want to preach that the war is over.

Democrats voted against Bernie twice, but I get what you’re saying.

That’s a lie.

It’s the disparity in wealth and rigged system that’s inspiring people towards violence.

Socially liberal ✅

Fiscally conservative ✅

Did they shut down due to a lack of business, or was it the government stepping in and imposing its mandate that everyone else has to follow no matter what?

If it’s the former, good. If it’s the latter, then it’s very bad.

Canada would have a leg to stand on here if it didn’t rely on the US military.

They choose to spend nothing on their military because they know the US will back them up if the need arises.

Yeah, newsweek.

Where’s CNN, CBS, ABC, MSNBC, NYT, WaPo? Radio silence because there’s nothing good to say, or we get some kind of opinion piece trying to paint Ukraine’s losses as wins and Zelensky as some hero.

The copium among you people is palpable. You’re incapable of recognizing when you’ve been taken for a ride or believed something that isn’t true.

Propaganda works both ways. If you have trouble accepting this, then it’s probably because you’ve fallen for it without realizing it and can’t admit it.

Do your own research.

If you’re trying to say that it doesn’t happen, then say it so we can all laugh at your willful ignorance.

Gonna block you now.

Some people just love to argue no matter what, lol.

News outlets will use migrant even if we know they are immigrants.

Sorry, you’re incorrect.

You’re moving goalposts, but ok.

Wikipedia already doesn’t allow that, so your question is pointless.

It’s part of liberals trying to control what other people think by controlling what they say and read.

The reason why news outlets aren’t allowed to say “immigrant” anymore is because college-educated liberals don’t want people who oppose immigration to have words to support their case.

I say this as someone who loves immigration. The policing of language by the left does more harm than good and only serves to feed the egos of slacktivists, not actually change the world in any meaningful way.

Yeah, no.

It’s still censorship even if the person in question wants it to be censored.

People shouldn’t get to dictate whether or not wikipedia articles are made of them.

That doesn’t make it ok.

The lack of western media reporting on the state of Ukraine leads me to believe they will make concessions to end the war soon.

Part of how propaganda works is not reporting on things that make ‘your side’ look bad. In other words, “no news is bad news.”

Say it.