Thiiis. The insiders need to laud the goals of protesters and the protesters need to ease off on the “complicit” insiders a bit. We are on the same team, and the combination of approaches is more powerful. Disagreeing on methods is fine, you pull, we push, momentum baby.
There are ways to resist short of burning shit down. The idea that this is a dichotomy is exactly the “yet you participate in society, interesting” meme.
What fucks with me is that you can’t control all the variables. School and peers can outweigh the ideas you try to put forward. I feel like I’m working on deprogramming more than I actually have a chance to teach already and my kids are only small.
Fuck me, for self-proclaimed coward you are unbelievably smug. Don’t you consider that a “better” life also means being able to take pride that the way you move through the world doesn’t actively harm others. Just awful.
I was a computer scientist at a time when early generative AI work refered to output as the model “dreaming”. Makes it sound kind of sweet. It was viewed as kind of kooky to run pattern recognition models forward…
Guess it depends how you define “bad”. In my eyes a good business does well by everyone: staff get well compensated and have a good work environment, customers get a good product at a fair price, suppliers get their invoices paid, owners (if not a coop) get some ROI and their name on the door. Trump has only ever managed 0.5 out of 4, ergo bad businessman.
Every UI is made for widescreen ratio right? So maybe one portait for reading is cool, but what else do you want it for?
“undetectable failure rate”. Not at all, we can detect failures by critically reading the output, just as we would with, say, a newspaper article. I think part of the danger is that we might start to think of an LLM as a reasoning calculator, rather than treating it like a person: biased, conflicted, malicious, whatever.
Difference is, everyone knows bioshock is entertainment. And no one bases their actual political philosophy on it.