• 0 Posts
  • 24 Comments
Joined 2 months ago
cake
Cake day: June 8th, 2025

help-circle
  • how is it also not a problem for people to violate immigration law

    Because they don’t give a flying fuck about whether the people they’re disappearing have violated any laws or not.

    They’ve disappeared citizens, they’ve disappeared people following the legal process to immigrate, without letting them finish, they’ve disappeared tourists who didn’t even have any intention to immigrate.

    They’re fascists. They don’t care about the law. It’s just an excuse to do what they want. Marketing to attract gullible racist idiots to their cause.

    But, even if that wasn’t enough, even if you don’t care about their real motives, even if you don’t care whether the law is good or not or how it’s applied, as I said in my previous answer they’re designing their new laws in such a way that it’s impossible for anyone not to violate them.

    Even if you were to always carry your parents’ and grandparents’ birth certificates on you, what about your great grandparents?

    Everyone in the USA is an immigrant or a descendant of immigrants! (Sure, some got there long enough ago that they were probably the first to arrive and can therefore be called natives, but they’re the wrong colour, so they don’t matter and will be disappeared anyway.)

    Ironically, the only people who’ll be able to prove they’re in the country legally (not that it matters, since, as I said, the fascists don’t care) will be those with a green card, properly stamped foreign passport, or similar documents.

    Making laws impossible to follow and then applying them arbitrarily to achieve their own goals and not the laws’ has been standard fascist fare since fascism was invented (and, before that, standard autocratic authoritarian fare).

    Watching fascists do their thing and pointing at the law and saying that their victims deserved it or should have known better is disingenuous at best, almost certainly malicious, and definitely monstrous.

    And I’ll finish with this:

    Not like the brazen giant of Greek fame,
    With conquering limbs astride from land to land;
    Here at our sea-washed, sunset gates shall stand
    A mighty woman with a torch, whose flame
    Is the imprisoned lightning, and her name Mother of Exiles.
    From her beacon-hand
    Glows world-wide welcome; her mild eyes command
    The air-bridged harbor that twin cities frame.

    “Keep, ancient lands, your storied pomp!” cries she
    With silent lips.
    "Give me your tired, your poor,
    Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
    The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
    Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me,
    I lift my lamp beside the golden door!

    Now, I’m not an American, I don’t care about American nationalism or pride, but this is what America, the USA, was supposed to be, what it was supposed to mean. A nation of immigrants, welcoming liberty seeking refugees to her shores. A beacon of freedom and democracy to which everyone could aspire.

    Of course, it never really was that. But it was a nice thought.

    Something is clear, though; anyone justifying the current government’s actions in the name of defending America, or American ideals or culture is either extremely ignorant or an hypocrite. And they’re most definitely un-American.

    And I’ll finish with this

    Ah, no, wait, sorry, there’s also this:

    This is the problem I have that leaves me stuck in the middle.

    There’s no middle ground with fascists.

    You’re either actively against them, or you’re part of the problem.

    Maybe you’re one of them, or just a useful hateful racist idiot aiding and abetting them while you wait for your turn to be disappeared for not being fascist enough, but if you’re not fighting against them you’re contributing to their crimes against humanity.

    And if you’re just a useful idiot, bear this in mind:

    You won’t appease them. They won’t stop. They won’t thank you. They won’t hesitate to treat you like any other undesirable (including many who believed themselves to be part of their group). You’ll end up like any other “illegal immigrant” when your turn comes.

    And if they’re not stopped, rest assured, it will come.


















  • And if I did, you deserved it

    Didn’t he sort of skip all the way to this point back in 2006 at Howard Stern’s when he set his minimum age for girls to have sex with at zero, sorry, thirteen…?

    “Do you think you could now be banging 24-year-olds,” Stern asked in the 2006 interview.

    “Oh, absolutely,” Trump responded “I have no trouble.”

    “Would you do it” Stern clarified.

    “I have no problem,” the future president said.

    Stern’s co-host Robin Quivers then asked, “do you have an age limit or would you…”

    “If I- No, no, I have no age–. I mean, I have an age li…” Trump replied.

    Then, when asked to provide his “upper bracket,” Trump said, “I don’t want to be like Congressman Foley, with, you know, 12-year-olds.”


  • empathy should be a basic requirement for any political office in a democracy

    Empathy should be a basic requirement for participation in society, period.

    The whole concept of a social contract is based (and dependant) on empathy.

    You lack empathy, you get put into a mental hospital to get it fixed, and to prevent you from harming others and society in general.

    If your case is currently incurable (probably because it’s not acquired but due to some as yet unfixable brain malformation), you get taken care of as well as possible for the rest of your life (or until a cure is developed), but prevented from ever interacting with society.

    This alone would fix most of humanity’s problems.


  • I think a good number of them have it educated out of them, by growing up in an environment where empathy is actively discouraged and portrayed as a negative trait.

    There’s also conditional empathy, where you’re taught that there are certain groups to whom empathy doesn’t apply (or that empathy only applies to your group), or applies to a lesser extent (e.g., your pet dog deserves empathy — unlike the neighbours’ —, but that empathy only extends to taking it behind the shed and shooting it, not to paying for a veterinarian to take care of the minor problem it’s suffering from).