tisktisk

I almost fully agree Idk about ‘should’ just out of paranoia that I can imagine a case where criticizing without sufficient contrast or a consistent-enough background of otherness, could potentially have unintended consequences or surprisingly negative overall moral impacts Or maybe just paranoid idek

Can’t criticize unless an alternative is provided tho, can you?

uwotm8?

Are you me?

As someone who hasn’t apple’d in over a decade, I thought this was real

Find what you love and let it kill you.
For me this was philosophy which is the opposite of convenient or helpful especially in our current era. It led to me consistently blundering my way forward but it serving as an initial point is the critical lesson to be learned, I think.

I’m trying to express two concerns about OP’s meta-language:

1. How specifically can we (the non-rich) take this post seriously without becoming just as immoral as those we wish to oppose? Aren’t we merely becoming the monsters we promised to slay? If so evil persists just in another form.

2. What is particularly unique about the post’s emphasis on “this time”? We have plenty of corroborating history and theory, most of which seems to indicate that nothing in our current era will have different outcomes than previous attempts. I’d almost argue the exact opposite, now is the time to think or reflect–never has there been a time more obviously in need of recoordinating, not idle activity/mechanical action.

I think it’s cuz everyone’s in a new level of dissatisfied. Not necessarily as in unprecedented severity–feels like more unconscious somehow. Like logic doesn’t enter the frame because we need more to be heard in truth rather than logically expressed correctly.

I believe your other questions have a place in Marxist theory technically–something about needing real existing socialism basically everywhere or it’s technically doomed to fail or something close to that. I’m unqualified

But if us proles proceed as this meme suggests, how do we plan on avoiding future prole gens from doing the same to us? And then who is really repeating ‘it’ and what specifically about this time distinguishes it from past/future iterations?

I think it’s like top 5 craziest beyond anything else they’ve heard thus far type of thing.

*for the poors

An in this very precise sense, the old people were grossly incorrect because they failed at creating a future that holds any value to this kind of lifestyle

Is this a showerthought or just wrong? Someone just learned that anecdotal evidence < material evidence by a lot

what are we looking at here? I tried researching labubu but I’m still missing something