First, I generally think you should call people whatever they want to be called, and in a non-casual setting, if I don’t have any better information, I like to call people by their most prestigious title. So, at a doctor’s office, I make sure to call them “Doctor.” I probably too aggressively call a professor “Professor”, simply because I think it’s a wonderful title. I love how it sounds and I love what it means.
Like you said, I sort of feel that they worked hard for these titles, and so why shouldn’t I recognize them for that? In those settings, I usually need them for their expertise, so why not elevate them? My ego doesn’t get hurt.
In a casual setting, and I include my own team at work as “casual”, I will still call people whatever they prefer. But if you want me to call you “Dr. Smith,” then what do you call me? If you call me “Mr. Brown” (name changed again), then I can accept it as meaning, “I don’t want to be friends.” But if you call me “Charlie”, then it becomes, “I think I am better than you.” My “Dr. Smith” was the type who called people “Charlie.”
“I don’t want to be friends,” is a little negative, because I think it degrades teamwork. But if that’s the way they prefer to be at work, I am not really personally offended.
“I think I am better than you” is simply an unacceptable way of thinking. I try my best not to compare myself to other people in this way, but if there’s anybody that I feel like I am better than, it’s people who openly act as if they’re better than others. For this “Dr. Smith,” honestly, whenever I said the words “Dr. Smith”, I thought of a professor back at college whose name was also, “Dr. Smith”, who was one of the best professors I ever had, and how I was stuck with this severely lacking and disappointing “Dr. Smith”.
Oh man, you hit upon why it makes me twitch. Because this has always been thoroughly hypothetical for me I somehow never considered the other half of the social equation!
Yes, that’s exactly it: if it’s used as a way to unduly elevate themselves over others. That was the part that I was stuck on but couldn’t articulate. Now I know what I would do if I ever ran into this situation (just call me mister, lol), so thanks for that.
First, I generally think you should call people whatever they want to be called, and in a non-casual setting, if I don’t have any better information, I like to call people by their most prestigious title. So, at a doctor’s office, I make sure to call them “Doctor.” I probably too aggressively call a professor “Professor”, simply because I think it’s a wonderful title. I love how it sounds and I love what it means.
Like you said, I sort of feel that they worked hard for these titles, and so why shouldn’t I recognize them for that? In those settings, I usually need them for their expertise, so why not elevate them? My ego doesn’t get hurt.
In a casual setting, and I include my own team at work as “casual”, I will still call people whatever they prefer. But if you want me to call you “Dr. Smith,” then what do you call me? If you call me “Mr. Brown” (name changed again), then I can accept it as meaning, “I don’t want to be friends.” But if you call me “Charlie”, then it becomes, “I think I am better than you.” My “Dr. Smith” was the type who called people “Charlie.”
“I don’t want to be friends,” is a little negative, because I think it degrades teamwork. But if that’s the way they prefer to be at work, I am not really personally offended.
“I think I am better than you” is simply an unacceptable way of thinking. I try my best not to compare myself to other people in this way, but if there’s anybody that I feel like I am better than, it’s people who openly act as if they’re better than others. For this “Dr. Smith,” honestly, whenever I said the words “Dr. Smith”, I thought of a professor back at college whose name was also, “Dr. Smith”, who was one of the best professors I ever had, and how I was stuck with this severely lacking and disappointing “Dr. Smith”.
Oh man, you hit upon why it makes me twitch. Because this has always been thoroughly hypothetical for me I somehow never considered the other half of the social equation!
Yes, that’s exactly it: if it’s used as a way to unduly elevate themselves over others. That was the part that I was stuck on but couldn’t articulate. Now I know what I would do if I ever ran into this situation (just call me mister, lol), so thanks for that.