• Zachariah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      68
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Harris is a woman, so I’m okay with this.

      edit:
      Oh, and because she turned black.

    • Pilferjinx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      3 days ago

      She represented the status quo every single person is so fucking sick of. To the point Donald Trump seemed like the better option to enough people. That’s an abysmal fucking failure of, well, the status quo.

      • merc@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I don’t think most people understood what the “status quo” was until Trump started destroying it.

        Yes, “status quo” is billionaires, and monopolies, and low-level corruption, and so-on.

        But, “status quo” is also civil liberties, a somewhat functional department of education, not having the national guard chasing down brown people in the street, a bureau of labour statistics that didn’t invent numbers to please the dear leader, cabinet secretaries that weren’t actively working to destroy the thing they were assigned to lead, low-level crony and nepo corruption and not over-the-top obvious bribery, and so-on.

    • BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      3 days ago

      I CANT believe you DIDNT vote Blue No Matter Who!

      -People voting for INDEPENDENT CUOMO over Democrat MAMDANI!

    • Gates9@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      44
      ·
      3 days ago

      I’m not putting my mark next to the name of someone who supports genocide, and Harris made it clear that her position was the same as Biden (“No daylight, kid”). It would be an act of tacit approval, and I would be complicit.

      • lectricleopard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        41
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        I refused to let a wanna be dictator walk into office without my ballot in the box for anyone with a chance to beat him. I think doing otherwise would be an act of tacit approval, and I would be complicit in all the deportations and rolling back of the rights of all Americans.

      • atomicorange@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Ever heard the term “pyrrhic victory”? Sure, you kept your hands clean, but you didn’t do yourself or the people of Gaza any favors.

    • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      50
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      I choose the lesser of two evils so I can feel smug as wealth inequality spirals out of control and the planet dies around me.

        • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          14
          ·
          3 days ago

          Yeah, it sucks that our population is so uneducated that they will just spitefully vote out the incumbent when the economy gets worse.

          But no amount of blaming voters will ever win a race, the Democrats failed to manipulate the dumbass masses, it’s the Democrats fault they lost.

      • sloppysol@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        33
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        As opposed to? Doing nothing? Voting to accelerate that process even faster? What do you think is going to happen next, now?

        • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          19
          ·
          3 days ago

          No dummy, i think we should discard the Duopoly and support a party that wants to IMPROVE things.

          Maybe after the next milquetoast neolib fails to improve things (because they refuse to attack their owners), and the next Republican fascist takes over (because wealth inequalityjust keeps getting worse), and we can finally learn this lesson.

          Because it’s been happening every 4-8 years for the last half century.

          • zzx@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            You can do both… Most people are trying to do both. Harm reduction and improvement are COMPATIBLE STRATEGIES. If you think you have helped the world by refusing to vote for Kamala, then you have fallen for propaganda. Everyone is sick of the neolibs… Doesn’t change that letting Donald Trump get elected was a deathblow to the United States

          • sloppysol@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 days ago

            What, everyone supporting a new party? Wasn’t there a book called Tipping Point? Why hasn’t it happened yet with that?

            I just don’t see how we can change the process, same as you, by everyone suddenly changing their minds before Trump dies setting a precedent for a third term. There aren’t enough Mamdani’s out there.

            Just shooting the shit dummy, not shitting on you.

        • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          14
          ·
          3 days ago

          I voted correctly last election, sucks our country’s to fucking dumb to know what’s best for them.

          No amount of blaming voters will ever win an election

          The “protest voters” did not meaningfully impact the election, no matter who the billionaire owned news tells you to be mad at.

          • MajinBlayze@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            Going to pretend this is a genuine question in case someone else sees this.

            First and most obviously: mutual aid networks, food kitchens, and other volunteer organizations are NGOs that provide literal relief from the immediate effects of economic inequalities.

            Additionally, these programs can be used to build relationships with people that agree broadly on these issues and develop the education needed to get people on board with more radical change.

            Second, engagement with local politics can be used to push political party platforms that are more beneficial to everyone. Yes, there is a ton of inertia to overcome, and national parties are heavily captured by capital interests, but a lot of concessions can, and have been, won at local and state levels. Again, even where this effort fails directly, it helps build the kind of connections needed to create the consent needed for more radical change.

            Finally, and most Libby, yes, also vote. Every lever we can keep out of the hands of opposition is one that is harder to use against us later.

            Voting is the least effective of these, but (until proven otherwise) there is still some power available to us through this method.

    • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      46
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Keeps’ blaming the base for the candidate staying pro-genocide. Precisely what mechanism should be be used to “move” 6 million voters on their anti-genocide position?

      Pretty bad look. Makes you look like a genocide apologist. You should just stop.

        • Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          These idiot’s solution to the trolley problem is to complain about the lever and how there should be better level so it’s not their fault for not pulling the lever that was available.

        • piefood@feddit.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          21
          ·
          3 days ago

          She wasn’t the only other choice. I had 4 choices, and a write in option. If you wanted the Democrats to continue to move to the right, you can just say that instead of making up excuses.

            • piefood@feddit.online
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              15
              ·
              3 days ago

              How many did Harris lose by? Was it enough that 3rd party votes mattered?

              I didn’t vote against Genocide and The War Machine because I thought we would win. I voted against them because they are evil.

              • SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                11
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 days ago

                I’m just wondering if they had a chance.

                If they lost by a couple percentage points it’s a lot different then if they only got a couple tenths of a point but I can tell by your dodging of the question what the answer is.

                • piefood@feddit.online
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  8
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  Of course they never had a chance to win. Americans care more about their team winning, then they care about stopping things like Genocide or War. Always have, and probably always will.

              • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                2 days ago

                I didn’t vote against Genocide and The War Machine

                Keep desperately trying to convince yourself of that.

        • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          39
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          You keep trying to blame the voters. Harris was the problem. Blaming the voters (which you did in real time in 2024) handed the election to Trump. You can’t, nor should you “move” 6 million people onto the wrong side of history by asking them to support a genocide. You might be able to move a candidate. Blaming voters is a total and complete distraction.

          You (and those who adopt the same strategy as you) are the reason we ended up with Trump. And this toxic, destructive mindset of yours needs to be buried so we can actually have a chance of stopping Trump in the future.

          • Zeke@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            38
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            3 days ago

            Voting red or not voting is still the reason Trump got into office. He supports the genocide, but ok, HaRriS BaD. Note I don’t like Democrats either, but I don’t agree with throwing votes away because of one issue that was worse on the other side. The people who didn’t vote or voted the other way supported genocide by letting Trump win.

            • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              22
              ·
              3 days ago

              But this is entirely the point. Blaming the voters gives you the opportunity to wash your hands and absolve blame, but it doesn’t get us any closer to winning the election in 2024. Not now, and not then, in 2024, when it was happening in real time.

              There was one way to beat Trump in 2024: Get more votes than him. Its obvious now that the argument “less bad” wasn’t good enough to convince 6 million people to show up. We ran the experiment. We got the data. We know the outcomes.

              If you, or SatansMaggotyCumFart, or anyone else wants to keep defending this approach, the onus is on you to provide a mechanism for how this argument gets Harris 6 million more votes.

              Satan’ thinks they have an axe to grind because they were couching their rhetoric with the expectation of failure from the onset. The argument that “less bad” should be good enough is bad politics and doesn’t work because it doesn’t convince any new voter who didn’t already accept that argument to show up. The more that argument shows up, the more people think that this failed approach to electoralism has legs, the further we get from actually being able to beat the Trumps of the world.

              Harris offered voters nothing, and we were quite literally begging her to throw a fucking crumb of rhetoric saying she would stop arms to Israel, because it was obvious to anyone with eyes that she was going to lose the election if she didn’t move on this issue in August. And Satans approach to that point was to push those who were critical of kamala FURTHER out of the party; basically the same treatment the DNC gave to Palestinians at the convention.

              Don’t be like Satan. We need to actually win, and Satan’s approach will lose us another election. Criticize candidates, intensely. FORCE them into positions that can actually get them elected. Demand that candidates move to where their voters are, because there is quite literally no mechanism to move 6 million voters into supporting genocide, and if you promote that, you are a bad person.

            • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              28
              ·
              edit-2
              3 days ago

              Good. Maybe go away from ever commenting again too.

              {What do you think the point of reposting hard evidence of your toxicity is?}

          • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            It really must be difficult to do the mental gymnastics required to absolve yourself from the key role that you played in the rise of American fascism… I mean, I get why. It must feel awful to know the truth.

            So blame everyone but yourself.

            • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              So what exactly is it you think you are accusing me of? Not voting sufficiently hard enough for Kamala? That I argued too strongly that Kamala wasn’t winning based on the data I had available and what analysis and inference I could develop?

              Or that I argued that she needed to do something different in her campaign to win based on where the electorate was at?

              Do you genuinely believe that because people pointed out that Kamala was running a disastrous campaign, that this was why she lost?

      • piefood@feddit.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        3 days ago

        I always find it telling when people blame the voters that couldn’t stomach voting for genocide, rather than blaming their candidates for chosing genocide.

        • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          3 days ago

          Its extremely telling; but its also like, brainlet level stupid:

          Their argument is that 6 million voters needed to vote differently, on their own. Like think the process through. How the fuck do you make that happen? What is the mechanism that changes 6 million voters minds?

          There is no mechanism that changes the mind of 6 million people. That’s not how elections work. Period. And keeping insisting that the voters “just needed to vote differently”, ok, but how? How does SatansMaggotyCumFart change 6 million minds on the matter by just repeating “Trump worse”?

          You can change the mind of one person (the candidate, Harris). We could have moved Harris if she knew she didn’t have enough of the bases support on this issue. But Blue MAGA/ BNMW through the entire country to the wolves so they could wash their hands of responsibility.

          • piefood@feddit.online
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            3 days ago

            I agree with you mostly, except for this part:

            We could have moved Harris if she knew she didn’t have enough of the bases support on this issue.

            I’m pretty sure the polling was out already, and she knew that she didn’t have support. But she cared more about money and building out the War Machine, than she cared about winning the election.

            • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              3 days ago

              than she cared about winning the election.

              Like, I want to believe she wanted to win, but because of the BNMW/ Blue MAGA, and the censorship across media that resulted of this (I mean we saw it here, directly), she didn’t think she needed to earn the bases support.

  • you_are_dust@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    73
    ·
    3 days ago

    I love having an Alzheimer’s patient as president. We have a minimum age for president and there should be a maximum age too.

    • Lembot_0004@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      Age is a bad criterium. Some people become degenerates at 50. Others are degenerates during all their lives.

      But I know a secret question to detect geniuses: What is bigger, bela or covfefe?

    • Herbie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      3 days ago

      I think whatever the average life expectancy is at the time of elections, the maximum age you can be president would be 10 years less. That way they have a decade to sit in the garbage world they created

      • felbane@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        3 days ago

        I think the maximum age for any federal office should be tied to the average national life expectancy in some way, so that if these fucks want to keep their office they have a vested interest in passing policy that makes life expectancy go up.

        • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          3 days ago

          This is the first time I’ve seen a comment about upper limits on age I could see making some amount of sense. Most of the other stuff boils down to bUt tEh gErOnTaCrAcY which is just so tiresome.

          This is something that this futurist can get behind, for sure. I am watching these current asshats working directly against increasing the average life expectancy right when I think we are right on the cusp of making massive breakthroughs.

    • Tehbaz@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Evidently not gonna happen until Americans experience mass starvation and enslavement by billionaire oligarchs. Right now they are just as passive as the Russian people and are letting king kiddy-fiddler & the GOP do whatever they want.

  • zzx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Okay then NVM lol sorry. To be fair you are still coming off as if you didn’t, and as if people SHOULDN’T vote with harm reduction in mind