• peoplebeproblems@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    I really don’t like where all this is going. And I’m surprised I didn’t see it until now.

    They’re trying to bring back owning human property in all forms. The Heritage Foundation probably doesn’t give two shits about the legality of raping anyone, they just want the wealthy to be able to do whatever they please with their property. If that property is children, they purchased it, it’s theirs.

    This is like a wild and scary crazy form of slavery. It’s not enough that people don’t have rights, it’s that the elite believe they can own *anything they want, including people."

    That’s what the heritage foundation is about. Property. What the actual fuck.

  • theprogressivist @lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    “Because, you know, it’s human nature, even when children are used,” she added.

    Wtf?

    “I was abused when I was three years old for the first time. So, I know what it is to have to deal with that all your life. I’m 74 now.”

    WHAT THE ACTUAL FUCK?

    “What I really hate are the lies of getting rid of Medicaid, getting rid of Social Security, or whatever they say. The Democrats keep putting that out, but it’s not.”

    Ok, I’m 100% sure this is one of Donnie boy’s staffers. And if it’s not, this is just sad and pathetic.

    GOP is filled with Boomers and Groomers

    • dipcart@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      12 days ago

      What a fucking insane take. Also, their concern about immigration is wacky as fuck too. ‘The ones I know are great but we can’t let them in because we don’t know them’. What does that even mean?

      Also, what are you worried about illegal immigrants doing? If you can excuse raping kids, what line could you be afraid of them crossing? Or do you just need to be a white American to rape kids, otherwise its a bad thing?

      The logic is honest to god fascinating. The example people give for who deserves the death penalty is usually a child predator. If you can include that in the ‘just human nature’ category, what are humans capable of that would be outside of their nature?

    • Lucky_777@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 days ago

      Not surprising. This person has probably never been wrong their whole life and probably has never admitted mistakes to her children. Typical MAGA bullshitter. Let her die with Trump’s dick in her mouth.

    • fartographer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 days ago

      I was abused when I was three years old for the first time.

      How many times was this person three years old? GRAMMAR BURN!

      But all these horrifying statements build the next obvious question: how old were you the first time you molested a child?

    • FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 days ago

      I’m so confused because I thought the rabid irrational hatred towards LGBT people was under the belief that they were a threat to kids. When did republicans pivot to thinking hurting kids was normal?

      • jj4211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 days ago

        On this case, the caller asserts she was sexually abused from the age of three and she’s just fine even at 74.

        So a deeply traumatized woman was screwed up by her experience.

  • lukaro@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 days ago

    It’s human nature to brutally murder someone for fucking with a kid. I think my statement holds more truth.

    • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      Not if you are a state actor in charge of a well financed honeypot scheme collecting blackmail evidence used to control the business and political elite of western nations.

      Then you do everything you can to keep the list of those you’ve compromised a secret. Even if you have to sacrifice a powerful (but stupid) piece.

      • lukaro@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        No! You do not allow the rape of children just so you can control the sick fuck who did it. Instead you brutally and publicly execute anyone who even suggests there might be benefits to letting children get rapped!