• Maple Engineer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    90 year olds aren’t going to vote for education, childcare, etc. They have a few years left to live. 16 year old have their entire lives to live. Look at what happened in Britain. Old people voted to withdraw from the EU which disproportionately harmed young, mobile professionals.

    • floofloof@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      This idea that old people care only about themselves is wrong, and very much a young person’s view. As you get older it’s not uncommon to care less about getting things for yourself (what are you going to do with it?) and more about the people and world you’re going to leave behind. An old person who appreciates the value of education or healthcare doesn’t stop wanting that for the country just because they’re soon going to be gone.

    • panda_abyss@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      A lot of 80/90 year olds have family they love.

      I get what you’re saying, but I don’t think letting 16 year olds vote is the right move.

      • Maple Engineer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 days ago

        All 16 year olds pay into the programs that support the few 90 year olds. They’re a pyramid scheme that takes from the young and gives to the old. 16 year olds are old enough to pay taxes and they are old enough to vote.

        No vote, no taxes.

        • panda_abyss@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          Canada’s OAS and CPP are not a pyramid scheme, they’re based on what you actually put in and guaranteed.

          They don’t have the solvency issues that US Social Security has.