You think trump being president is good because you’re an accelerationist.
You don’t argue like trump, you’re far more coherent than he is, but you argue like he wants you to.
You spend lots of time and effort persuading left leaning people to do anything other than vote Democratic, doing exactly trump’s will.
They argue on the Dems behalf though and argue just like they’re supposed to. Someone who supports them is no better than those sitting at the top.
This is you arguing that PugJesus preferring the less genocide, less transphobia option means they’re just as bad as the democratic leadership, because they argue as the Democratic leadership would want them to, swerving my original point.
And you argue just like Trump wanted you to. Does that make you no better than him?
This is me pointing out that you argue just like the Republican Party leadership would want you to.
If you think I argue like Trump, you gott learn some reading comprehension.
This is you misquoting me, swerving my point about your hypocrisy. The irony is strong in this one.
I know your lib brain is too small to understand this,
This is you resorting to insulting me.
but there is more than being a n American liberal or an American conservative.
and this is you very much incorrectly diagnosing my political stance.
It’s ironic how you want to point out flaws in my argument, complain about being insulted as a lib while you’ve been doing exactly that before me.
You’re making huge assumptions. I don’t talk like right wingers want me to. Neither those in Washington, nor those in Moscow. I argue like a Marxist should. Stating the truth and arguing for what is best in the long term.
I don’t spend time trying to convince “leftists” to not vote for Democrats. I couldn’t give a rats ass about what dumbass Americans do. I do not care to argue with liberals about politics. That is like trying to talk algebra with a toddler.
Lastly regarding the brain-dead OP. He isn’t arguing for less genocide and oppression instead of more. He’s arguing for any amount of genocide and oppression instead of arguing for none. That is what democrats are. They don’t want the lesser evil to avoid the greater evil. They want evil for evils sake.
All I said is that I’m glad they’re suffering from their own stupidity now.
Outside the bubble of the US, Trump was overwhelmingly positive for the rest of the world. He meant a shrinking and slow isolation of the US empire, letting the rest of the world breathe a bit. Europe has to seriously consider becoming independent, at least until Trump is out again and China has been able to grow diplomatically and economically despite the trade war leading to a slightly more multipolar world. The decline of the US empire is a win for the world, it gives room for the possibility of change.
Claims to be a leftist, supports the most rightwing government we’ve seen in our lifetimes, in the most powerful country in the world economically and militarily.
Claims to be against genocide, also thinks “Trump was overwhelmingly positive for the rest of the world.”
Claims not to spend time arguing with leftists/liberals about various things, spends two days doing exactly that.
You think trump being president is good because you’re an accelerationist.
You don’t argue like trump, you’re far more coherent than he is, but you argue like he wants you to.
You spend lots of time and effort persuading left leaning people to do anything other than vote Democratic, doing exactly trump’s will.
This is you arguing that PugJesus preferring the less genocide, less transphobia option means they’re just as bad as the democratic leadership, because they argue as the Democratic leadership would want them to, swerving my original point.
This is me pointing out that you argue just like the Republican Party leadership would want you to.
This is you misquoting me, swerving my point about your hypocrisy. The irony is strong in this one.
This is you resorting to insulting me.
and this is you very much incorrectly diagnosing my political stance.
It’s ironic how you want to point out flaws in my argument, complain about being insulted as a lib while you’ve been doing exactly that before me.
You’re making huge assumptions. I don’t talk like right wingers want me to. Neither those in Washington, nor those in Moscow. I argue like a Marxist should. Stating the truth and arguing for what is best in the long term.
I don’t spend time trying to convince “leftists” to not vote for Democrats. I couldn’t give a rats ass about what dumbass Americans do. I do not care to argue with liberals about politics. That is like trying to talk algebra with a toddler.
Lastly regarding the brain-dead OP. He isn’t arguing for less genocide and oppression instead of more. He’s arguing for any amount of genocide and oppression instead of arguing for none. That is what democrats are. They don’t want the lesser evil to avoid the greater evil. They want evil for evils sake.
All I said is that I’m glad they’re suffering from their own stupidity now. Outside the bubble of the US, Trump was overwhelmingly positive for the rest of the world. He meant a shrinking and slow isolation of the US empire, letting the rest of the world breathe a bit. Europe has to seriously consider becoming independent, at least until Trump is out again and China has been able to grow diplomatically and economically despite the trade war leading to a slightly more multipolar world. The decline of the US empire is a win for the world, it gives room for the possibility of change.
Claims to be a leftist, supports the most rightwing government we’ve seen in our lifetimes, in the most powerful country in the world economically and militarily.
Claims to be against genocide, also thinks “Trump was overwhelmingly positive for the rest of the world.”
Claims not to spend time arguing with leftists/liberals about various things, spends two days doing exactly that.
You’re so full of shit.