They need to get their heads on straight.

Having them slanted to the right is a big part of the problem.

It is really weird to me that you felt the need to do this.

I wasn’t able to find any 3rd party sources verifying this.

This is fucking terrifying.

We need to deal with these people yesterday.

He has given no indication of it, and it is currently canceled.

“To support those negotiations, the Minister of Finance and National Revenue, the Honourable François-Philippe Champagne, announced today that Canada would rescind the Digital Services Tax (DST) in anticipation of a mutually beneficial comprehensive trade arrangement with the United States.”

https://www.canada.ca/en/department-finance/news/2025/06/canada-rescinds-digital-services-tax-to-advance-broader-trade-negotiations-with-the-united-states.html

Seems that the rescinding of this legislation is tied to a “mutually beneficial and comprehensive trade arrangement” demonstrating that the DST is not currently completely off the table. In fact, the legislation to rescind it hasn’t been tabled yet.

“The June 30, 2025 collection will be halted, and Minister Champagne will soon bring forward legislation to rescind the Digital Services Tax Act.”

What information do you have that says we won’t institute the DST in the future if no deal is reached?

I am guessing they are referring to the education programs under UNRWA that allegedly were unaltered and issued by the Palestinian Authority which promoted and instilled hate of Israelis.

If anyone is interested in the details surrounding that entire situation.

https://www.unrwa.org/unrwa-claims-versus-facts-2025

What information do you have that says we won’t institute the DST in the future if no deal is reached?

Trump says “No further negotiations if the DST goes through”

I am asking you specifically, what does a firm stance look like to you in that situation?

What are the consequences of that stance?

That was my bad. I hit the wrong button… haha

I think we need our own everything. If it isn’t being done in Canada and we are relying on someone else for it, we should be on that whenever and as soon as possible. Especially considering how unstable the geopolitical situation is.

Whether left or right, they want you to believe their nonsense.

Now do everyone in, and in support of, the Likud party.

I am still holding hope that Pierre is on the way out, but I do agree that this 34% of Canadians represents a clear and present danger to Canada as a whole.

A third of Canadians need to get their heads on right.

From your source. Again.

Currently, the main estimates don’t suggest major cuts to the public service, Giroux said.

What do you expect him to do, as in, what does a “firm stance” look like to you?

I do not remember a single part of the Liberal election platform that said “We won’t cut funding in public services”. The only thing I can remember being exclusively off the table were cuts to Provincial transfers.

It would be nice if the article cited those promises, but that is the Ottawa Citizen (Post media) for you.

“The Government of Canada will not accept a bad deal,” Carney said in French in Huntsville, Ont., Tuesday. “Our objective is not to reach a deal whatever it costs. We are pursuing a deal that will be in the best interest of Canadians.”

When it comes to the prospect of reaching a deal, Carney said “we’ll see” and that “complex negotiations” continue. He said if there isn’t a deal that works for Canada, his government will “take stock” and consider what to do next.

This doesn’t sound like what you are describing, and seems firm considering how dangerous of a situation this is.

“I’ve had over 80 bilaterals with world leaders since I became prime minister. A number of the premiers have been on major trade missions. We have other things to do,” he said.

This sounds like the Government has other plans for when Trump talks fall through. Which has been being worked on over the last few months. From trade to arms procurement there is a lot of diversification efforts happening across governments.

There is a lot going on and the focus doesn’t really seem to be getting something from the US anytime soon.

I would argue this time Carney’s comment is a worthless plattitude. You can sign anything and claim it was the best deal for Canada.

What does a good deal for Canada look like to you?

What supports your argument?

You could look at him removing the digital services tax and negotiating with the US as anti-Canada things he’s done

Despite him saying he’s looking out for Canada

One could look at it like that, but I do not see why they would. Can you explain why one would see it that way?