I’ve been saying this a couple places recently, but why not pass legislation requiring every site to provide a content rating. Then parents can choose if they want to restrict content by ratings or not. Yeah, you could have malicious actors, but it makes it easier and simpler for everyone to work than having ID laws.

It’s a good poem, but not a limerick. Limericks have 5 stanzas in AABBA format.

https://literarydevices.net/limerick/

I mean, in hindsight sure, but at the time no one knew what a post covid world would look like.

It’s actually the more practical of the crypto currencies from my perspective. It’s setup to enable things like smart contracts and exchanges and was a big driver of web 3.0.

Not that I’m a big proponent of web 3.0, it at least tried to be a currency unlike every other crypto currency.

While it got a lot of flack, I thought the smaller contained worlds of Outer Worlds can be a better in between. Open spaces to explore and run into things accidentally, but constrained enough that the world and plot can still flourish.

I thought the world and travel mechanics were fun, and the leveling system was cool (basically get better skills by using other skills).

Overall though, it falls into the trap of most open world games. Big, beautiful, and boring.

But I also don’t care for BOTW and TOTK over more traditional Zeldas, so maybe I’m just anti open world games.

Yeah, I don’t know why this is so difficult. Can even have players that autoread the signature to tell you the source/etc.

I was talking to a relative about this recently. Basically anything that would be an upgrade would end up with me owning more on the new house with rate almost twice as high.

Literally going to be living in this house the rest of my life, given the way things are going.

In this case it seems like die