While I agree that non-violent is the way to go, I think we need to change our definition of “violence.”

Property destruction should not be considered violent. Especially when precautions are specifically taken to ensure that no people were harmed during act of property destruction or sabotage.

On the other side of things, actions such as destroying wildlife habitat or polluting the air, water, and soil systems of the Earth should be considered “violence.” It is violence towards all of humanity, and towards life itself.

Maybe the plan should be to destroy fossil fuel infrastructure via Ecotage/eco-sabotage.

Maybe we can weaken and start dismantling the fascist government following the guidelines of the CIA’s Citizen Sabotage Field Manual from 1944.

Maybe we eat the rich.

So instead of asking what the plan is sarcastically, try asking it genuinely. Just because an answer sounds ridiculous and difficult, doesn’t mean it will fail. The discussion needs to lead towards finding which plan would be most effective and why/why not.